CCAO-F practice › Output Evaluation and Validation · Question 21 of 100
Output Evaluation and Validation
A program manager reviews a Claude-drafted board update. The executive summary says all milestones are on track, but the milestone table later in the document shows two milestones as delayed. What is the most appropriate action?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A — Check both statements against the project tracker and correct whichever part is wrong before sending
An internal inconsistency means at least one part is wrong. The fix is to check both against the system of record and correct the output (a). Deleting the table hides the conflict instead of resolving it, and may remove the accurate part (b). Picking the summary without checking is a guess (c). A new version that happens to be consistent could be consistently wrong (d).
Keep going
More Output Evaluation and Validation questions
- A recruiter's prompt asked Claude to write an inclusive job ad. The draft describes the…
- A customer support lead asks Claude how many days customers have to request a refund…
- A strategy manager at a regional bakery chain reviews a Claude-drafted analysis of two…
- A communications officer had an event press release fact-checked and approved. She then…
- An office manager asks Claude, with web search on, what the company's per-night hotel…