CCAO-F practice › Output Evaluation and Validation · Question 20 of 100
Output Evaluation and Validation
A grant writer asks Claude, with no files uploaded and no search enabled, for a paragraph on the impact of after-school programs. The draft cites a named report from a specific foundation with a publication year and a precise percentage. What is the most appropriate action?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: C — Search for the report and confirm the figure in it; remove or replace the claim if it can't be found
A specific, plausible citation produced with no source supplied is the typical pattern of a hallucination. It must be confirmed in the real source, or replaced or removed (c). Specificity is what makes fabrications convincing, not proof that they're real (a). Regenerating without grounding may just produce a different made-up figure (b). Vaguer wording still presents an unverified number as evidence (d).
Keep going
More Output Evaluation and Validation questions
- A program manager reviews a Claude-drafted board update. The executive summary says all…
- A recruiter's prompt asked Claude to write an inclusive job ad. The draft describes the…
- A customer support lead asks Claude how many days customers have to request a refund…
- A strategy manager at a regional bakery chain reviews a Claude-drafted analysis of two…
- A communications officer had an event press release fact-checked and approved. She then…