CCAR-P practice › Governance, Safety & Risk Management · Question 86 of 110
Governance, Safety & Risk Management
A recruiting platform uses Claude to rank applicants against job descriptions. To address bias concerns, the team removed name, age and gender from the input. Overall ranking quality looks strong on the eval set. What is the best next step to assess fairness?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B — Test counterfactual pairs varying proxies and report outcomes per segment against an agreed criterion
Removing explicit attributes doesn't remove proxies, and aggregate quality hides group-level differences. Counterfactual tests and disaggregated metrics against a deliberately chosen criterion measure the effect directly. (a) is guidance, not a control or evidence. (c) sharpens the wrong metric. (d) may strip job-relevant information and still hasn't measured anything.
Keep going
More Governance, Safety & Risk Management questions
- A public-sector benefits agency uses Claude to draft eligibility determinations that…
- A wealth-management firm deploys a Claude agent that answers advisors' questions about…
- An agent triages inbound customer emails, summarizes them, and has tools to look up…
- A platform team runs a Claude-based internal agent for IT operations. It has tools for…
- An insurer's policy Q&A assistant has run well for months. The week after the content…