A team lead uses Claude to draft a short, light-hearted recap of last week's team lunch for the internal team channel. A colleague suggests routing it through legal and HR review first, 'just to be safe.' What is the most appropriate approach?

Answer: A — The team lead reads it through and posts it, since it's low-stakes, internal, and easy to fix

Review should match the risk. Low-stakes, internal, easily corrected content needs only the author's own check (a). Requiring expert sign-off for everything wastes reviewers' time and slows teams down (b). Refusing to share is an overreaction (c). A disclaimer doesn't replace a quick read-through and adds nothing useful here (d).