CCAR-P practice › Governance, Safety & Risk Management · Question 79 of 110
Governance, Safety & Risk Management
A healthcare payer's prior-authorization assistant proposes approve or deny recommendations. Clinical reviewers must sign off on every denial. After launch, reviewers accept 99% of denial recommendations with a median review time under 30 seconds, and an audit finds several denials that contradict the patient's records. What is the most effective improvement?
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D — Show cited record excerpts per criterion, flag conflicts, and seed known errors to measure catch rate
The pattern of near-total acceptance and very fast reviews indicates automation bias. Reviewers need evidence and pointed prompts for judgment, and the organization needs a measure of whether review works. (a) doubles cost without restoring scrutiny. (b) relies on uncalibrated self-reported confidence and doesn't fix the review. (c) removes a gate on a consequential, hard-to-reverse decision about a person.
Keep going
More Governance, Safety & Risk Management questions
- A logistics company's agent can reschedule deliveries, issue refunds up to a configured…
- A team implemented an approval step for high-value contract amendments: the agent drafts…
- A European retailer's support assistant stores conversation transcripts, writes full…
- A US clinic network's legal team has confirmed a business associate agreement covering…
- A federal agency contractor is designing a Claude-based document analysis system for…