A team split contract drafting into six agents, one per clause type. Clauses cross-reference each other and share defined terms heavily. Drafts now have inconsistent definitions and contradictory clauses. What is the most appropriate change?

Answer: B — Use one drafter with the full contract context and add a separate review pass for cross-clause consistency

The work is tightly interdependent, so splitting it loses the context each piece needs; (b) restores shared context and adds an explicit consistency check. (a) patches symptoms after the fact. (c) removes the single point of control and scatters coordination. (d) passes lossy summaries that still miss cross-references.