A nonprofit communications officer drafts donor updates with Claude. Several donors have replied that the updates are hard to follow and don't say what their money achieved. She also notices she rewrites the opening of every draft. What is the most appropriate adjustment?

Answer: D — Turn the feedback into instructions (lead with impact, plain language), add an approved example, and check donor reactions.

Recurring feedback and her own repeated edits are clear evidence of what to change. Option (d) turns them into concrete instructions and examples and closes the loop by checking results. (a) avoids the problem rather than fixing it. (b) is too vague to change the output reliably. (c) dismisses a consistent pattern that her own edits confirm.